OCCC 提案细节：三类冒充电路与「按流片来历」验真OCCC proposal details: three kinds of fake circuits, provenance-based verification

2026-11-08 00:13·@Gm_LSP·协议Protocol·75分pts

Leesp 提交提案，提出「官方策展电路集合」（OCCC），针对流片池中真假电路混杂、玩家容易买错的问题。文中把混入者分三类：仅一到三个门的玩具电路；不花晶体管、只引用正品数据的 REF 包装壳，需比对原始字节才能识别；照正品重流一份的同网表复制品，原始数据一致，只看内容无法分辨。因此提案把判据改为「一件电路是不是官方作品，取决于它由谁流片出来，而不是它长什么样」，并称项目方会在一笔交易里新建处理器、把晶体管全部铸给自己。Leesp submitted a proposal for an official curated circuit collection (OCCC), addressing the problem that real and fake circuits are mixed in the tape-out pool and players can easily buy the wrong one. The post sorts intruders into three kinds: toy circuits of only one to three gates; REF wrappers that spend no transistors and merely reference genuine data, identifiable only by comparing raw bytes; and same-netlist copies re-taped from the original, whose raw data matches so content alone cannot tell them apart. The proposal therefore switches the criterion to who taped out a circuit rather than what it looks like, noting the team creates the processor in one transaction and mints all transistors to itself.